Method and system for processing structured documents stored in a database

ABSTRACT

A method, computer readable medium, and system for processing a structured document are disclosed. The method, computer readable medium, and system include identifying a plurality of strings processed by a database, assigning an identifier to each of the plurality of strings, storing each of the plurality of strings and its assigned identifier in a table in the database, and utilizing the table during document processing.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.10/652,662, filed Aug. 28, 2003, which is hereby incorporated byreference in its entirety for all purposes as if fully set forth herein.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to computer implemented databasesystems and, more particularly, to an improved method and system forprocessing structured documents stored in a database system.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Structured documents are documents which have nested structures.Documents written in Extensible Markup Language (XML) are structureddocuments. XML is quickly becoming the standard format for deliveringinformation over the Internet because it allows the user to design acustomized markup language for many classes of structured documents. Forexample, a business can easily model complex structures such as purchaseorders in XML format and send them for further processing to itsbusiness partners. XML supports user-defined tags for better descriptionof nested document structures and associated semantics, and encouragesthe separation of document content from browser presentation.

As more and more businesses present and exchange data in XML documents,database management systems (DBMSes) have been developed to store, queryand retrieve these documents which are typically stored on direct accessstorage devices (DASD), such as magnetic or optical disk drives forsemi-permanent storage. Some DBMSes, known as relational databases,store and query the documents utilizing relational techniques, whileother DBMSes, known as native databases, store the documents in theirnative formats.

As stated above, one attractive feature of XML is that it allows theuser to design a customized markup language for many classes ofstructured documents. The user can select element and attribute namesthat are relevant to and descriptive of the particular class ofdocument. While this provides the user with great flexibility, it alsopresents problems for database processing. Evaluating stringscorresponding to element names is costly because the strings are ofvarying length and the database processor, at a minimum, must performlength checks. Such length checks add costs during runtime and alsocomplicate program coding. In addition, processing variable lengthstrings complicates memory management in the database. Moreover, inorder to store XML documents in their native format in a database, theelement and attribute names, along with other strings, must be stored ondisk. For large documents, the amount of disk space required to store acollection of such documents can be quite large and expensive.

To alleviate the storage problem, it is common to compress a document inorder to reduce the amount of storage space required to store it. Atypical compression method involves replacing certain strings withnumbers and storing mapping information in a file specific or documentspecific table. The mapping table is stored in front of the file ordocument. While this method reduces the size of the document, it alsopresents several disadvantages in the storage and processing of suchdocuments. First, storing the mapping information in each file/documentrequires additional disk space for each ifle/document. Second, becauseeach compressed file/document is associated with its own mapping table,the numbers associated with the strings in one compressed file/documentdo not correspond to the same strings in a different compressedfile/document. Accordingly, because the numbers are not consistentthroughout the database, the numbers cannot be used for purposes beyonddocument compression. Instead, the compressed documents must bedecompressed before they can be processed. Once the document isdecompressed, i.e., the numbers are replaced with the associatedstrings, the query processor is still required to evaluate strings.

Accordingly, a need exists for an improved method and system forprocessing structured documents stored in a database. The method andsystem should reduce the size of a structured document for storage,while supporting homogeneous document processing. The present inventionaddresses such a need.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A method, computer readable medium, and system for processing astructured document are disclosed. The method, computer readable medium,and system provide for identifying a plurality of strings processed bythe database, assigning an identifier to each of the plurality ofstrings, storing each of the plurality of strings and its assignedidentifier in a table in the database, wherein at least one of theplurality of strings is not derived from one or more structureddocuments stored in the database and at least another of the pluralityof strings is derived from the one or more structured documents storedin the database, and utilizing the table during document processing.

According to an embodiment, a global association table is provided tostore strings and their respective identifiers. The strings correspondto element names, attribute names, and namespaces in one embodiment.Because a global association table is utilized, an identifier for aparticular string can be used in place of the string throughout thedatabase. By replacing strings with their respective identifiers,document processing and storage are significantly improved.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary computer environment for usewith the present invention.

FIG. 2A is a flowchart illustrating a method for processing a structureddocument stored in a database according to the embodiment of the presentinvention.

FIG. 2B is an association table according to an embodiment of thepresent invention.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a method for utilizing theassociation table during document storage according to an embodiment ofthe present invention.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating a method for utilizing theassociation table during query processing according to an embodiment ofthe present invention.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating how the cache is utilized when arequest for a string identifier is processed according to the embodimentof the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention relates generally to computer implemented databasesystems and, more particularly, to an improved method and system forprocessing structured documents stored in their native format in adatabase. The following description is presented to enable one ofordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is providedin the context of a patent application and its requirements. Variousmodifications to the embodiment and the generic principles and featuresdescribed herein will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art.For example, the following discussion is presented in the context of aDB2® database environment available from IBM® Corporation. It should beunderstood that the present invention is not limited to DB2® and may beimplemented with other database management systems. Thus, the presentinvention is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with theprinciples and features described herein.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, an identifier isassigned to each of a plurality of strings that is processed by thedatabase, and the string and its assigned identifier are stored in aglobal database table. Because the global database table comprisesstrings used throughout the database, it is not limited to a single fileor document. Thus, the table is associated with the database, and notwith a particular file or document in the database. In one embodiment,strings associated with element names, attribute names and namespaces,and their respective identifiers are stored in the table.

To describe further the present invention, please refer to FIG. 1, whichis an exemplary computer environment for use with the present invention.In FIG. 1, a typical distributed computer system 100 utilizes a network103 to connect client computers 102 executing client applications to aserver computer 104 executing software and other computer programs, andto connect the server computer 104 to data stores 106. These systems arecoupled to one another by various networks, including LANs, WANs, andthe Internet. Each client computer 102 and the server computer 104additionally comprise an operating system and one or more computerprograms (not shown).

The server computer 104 uses a data store interface (not shown) forconnecting to the data stores 106. The data store interface may beconnected to a database management system (DBMS) 105, which supportsaccess to the data stores 106. The DBMS 105 can be a relational databasemanagement system (RDBMS) capable of storing structured documents intheir native formats, such as the DB2® system developed by IBM®Corporation, or it also can be a native XML database system. Theinterface and DBMS 105 may be located at the server computer 104 or maybe located on one or more separate machines. The data stores 106 may begeographically distributed.

The DBMS 105 and the instructions derived therefrom are all comprised ofinstructions which, when read and executed by the server computer 104cause the server computer 104 to perform the steps necessary toimplement and/or use the present invention. The exemplary environmentillustrated in FIG. 1 is not intended to limit the present invention,and alternative environments may be used without departing from thescope of the present invention. For instance, while a single servercomputer system 104 is illustrated, it is well understood that multipleprocessing systems, known as nodes, could be linked to the network 103in a Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) environment.

FIG. 2A is a flowchart illustrating a method for processing a structureddocument stored in a database according to the embodiment of the presentinvention. In step 202, a plurality of strings processed by the DBMS 105are identified. An identifier is then assigned to each of the pluralityof strings in step 204. In step 206, the strings and their respectiveidentifiers are stored in a table, and in step 208, the DBMS 105utilizes the table to replace the plurality of strings with theirassigned identifiers. Thereafter, the identifiers, as opposed to thestrings, are used during document processing.

Referring again to FIG. 1, an association table 200 is provided. Theassociation table is stored on-disk in the database 106 a in theembodiment. In an MPP environment, the association table 200 may bestored in a catalog node in order to avoid adding a new single point offailure. The association table 200 is a database-global table, i.e., theentire database system shares the association table 200, and is adictionary that maps strings to identifiers, hereinafter referred to asStringIDs. In an embodiment, the strings include all element names,attribute names, namespace Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs), andnamespace prefixes found in documents stored in the database. Byreplacing strings with their respective StringIDs, document processingand storage are significantly improved.

Shown in FIG. 2B is an exemplary association table 200 according to anembodiment of the present invention, where the table 200 is aconventional relational, e.g., SQL, table. As is shown, the table 200comprises a string column (202) and a StringID column (204). The stringcolumn (202) contains the strings corresponding to, for example,elements (e.g., 202 a and 202 b), attributes (e.g., 202 c), andnamespaces (not shown). The StringID column (204) contains the StringIDs(204 a-204 e) associated with the strings (202 a-202 e).

In one embodiment, each StringID is a fixed size integer representing avariable length string. The StringID is used in place of the stringthroughout the database. For example, during storage, the DBMS 105stores a StringID of an element's name and a StringID of the element'snamespace instead of the corresponding variable length strings. Inanother example, during query processing, variable length strings in thequery are converted to their respective StringIDs and therefore, theStringIDs in the query, and not the variable length strings, arecompiled and executed. In summary, the StringIDs instead of the stringsare utilized for storage and internal processing of the database.

Several advantages flow from this utilization. First, because theStringID is generally smaller than its corresponding string, storing theStringID requires less storage space than storing the string. Thus, theStringID is used to compress the document and less disk space isrequired to store documents. Also, any other related databasecomponents, e.g., indices or a path table, require less storage space.Second, because the association table is global, a separate mappingtable is not required to be stored with each document and the StringIDscan be utilized for homogeneous processing. Third, because the StringIDsare of a fixed size (e.g., four bytes) and consistent throughout thedatabase, internal processing is simplified and performance improved.For instance, because StringIDs are fixed sized integers, comparingthem, as opposed to variable length strings, is more efficient and lesscomplicated.

As stated above, some of the strings in the association table 200 arethose found in documents stored in the database. In an embodiment, theassociation table 200 also includes strings found in sources other thanstored documents. For example, a query can introduce new element andattribute names based on a new document created from the result of thequery. Such elements and attributes are referred to as “constructed”elements and attributes to distinguish them from those found indocuments stored in the database. The strings associated withconstructed elements (e.g., 202 d and 202 e) and attribute names arestored in the association table 200 and assigned a StringID (e.g., 204 dand 204 e). By doing so, the strings in the query can also be convertedto StringIDs, which ensures homogeneous processing throughout thedatabase.

According to the embodiment, the association table 200 further comprisesa status column (206) that indicates whether a string is “temporary” or“permanent.” Strings derived from documents stored in the database(e.g., 202 a, 202 b, and 202 c) are assigned “permanent” or “P” statusbecause such strings are repeatedly used in document processing. Stringsderived from sources other than documents stored in the database (e.g.,202 d and 202 c), for instance, from a query, are assigned “temporary”or “T” status because they are generally utilized once, e.g., duringcompile and execution of the query. Thus, a database administrator canutilize the DBMS 105 to automatically manage the size and content of theassociation table 200 by periodically checking the status column 206 ofeach string (202 a-202 e) and deleting those strings whose status istemporary (206 d, 206 e).

To describe how the association table 200 is utilized in step 208 ofFIG. 2A, please refer now to FIG. 1, FIG. 2B and FIG. 3. FIG. 3 is aflowchart illustrating a method for utilizing the association table 200during document storage according to an embodiment of the presentinvention. As is shown in FIG. 1, the DBMS 105 includes a StringIDgenerator 300, which is utilized by processing mechanisms in the DBMS105, e.g., a storage mechanism 110 and a compiler 120, to request andprocure StringIDs (204 a-204 e) for strings (202 a-202 e).

The process begins at step 302 when the storage mechanism 110 receivesand parses a structured document that is to be stored in the database106 a. In one embodiment, the storage mechanism 110 stores thestructured document as a plurality of nodes that form a node tree. Notethat the nodes forming the node tree are not related to the nodes in anMPP environment. Each node in the tree includes its name, its namespaceand its path. In order to minimize the size of the node, the stringsassociated with the name and namespace are converted to their respectiveStringIDs. Thus, in step 304, the storage mechanism 110 considers afirst string (e.g., 202 a) in the document and in step 306, requests aStringID for the string from the StringID generator 300.

In step 308, the StringID generator 300 performs a lookup on theassociation table 200 for the string. If the string is found in theassociation table 200 (step 310), the StringID generator 300 thendetermines whether the string's status is temporary (in step 311) bychecking the status column 206. If the string's status is not temporary,i.e., its status is permanent, then the StringID generator 300 returnsthe StringID (e.g., 204 a) corresponding to the string to the storagemechanism 110 in step 316. If the string's status is temporary, theStringID generator 300 changes the status to permanent in step 313 andreturns the StringID in step 316. The StringID generator 300 changes thestring's status from temporary to permanent because the string isderived from a document that is, or will be, stored in the database.

If the string is not found in the association table 200 (step 310), theStringID generator 300 creates a new StringID for the string and marksthe new string's status as permanent in step 312. In step 314, the newstring, its StringID and its status is inserted into and stored in theassociation table 200. Next, the StringID generator 300 returns the newStringID to the storage mechanism 110 in step 316.

Once the StringID is returned, the storage mechanism 110 replaces thestring (e.g., 202 a) with its StringID (e.g., 204 a) in step 318, andconsiders a next string (e.g., 202 b) in the document via step 320.Steps 306 through 320 are repeated until the storage mechanism 10 hasreplaced all of the strings with their respective StringIDs. The storagemechanism 110 then proceeds with its normal processing steps to storethe document in its native format in the database.

Another example of how the association table 200 is utilized in step 208of FIG. 2A is described in FIG. 4 FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating amethod for utilizing the association table 200 during query processingaccording to an embodiment of the present invention. The process beginsin step 402 when a query is received by the compiler 120. Typically, thequery comprises a request to access at least one node in a document in acollection of documents. In an embodiment, the query comprises a path tothe requested node. The path is a “road map” to the node and comprisesthe names of the nodes in the node tree that lead to the requested node.According to the embodiment, the compiler 120 converts the query from acollection of strings to a collection of StringIDs.

In step 404, the compiler 120 considers a first string. The compiler 120then requests a StringID for the string from the StringID generator 300in step 406. In step 408, the StringID generator 300 performs a lookupon the association table 200 for the string. If the string is found inthe association table 200 (step 410), the StringID generator 300 returnsthe StringID corresponding to the string to the compiler 120 in step416. If the string is not found in the association table 200 (step 310),the string is a constructed string. As such, the StringID generator 300creates a new StringID for the constructed string and marks theconstructed string's status as temporary in step 412. In step 414, theconstructed string, its StringID, and its status are inserted into andstored in the association table 200. Next, the StringID generator 300returns the new StringID to the compiler 120 in step 416.

Once the StringID is returned, the compiler 120 replaces the string withits StringID in step 418, and considers a next string in the documentvia step 420. Steps 406 through 420 are repeated until the compiler 120has replaced all of the strings in the query with their respectiveStringIDs. The compiler 120 then proceeds with its normal processingsteps, such as optimizing the query, and generating an executable planto access the data in the documents.

In one embodiment, a cache 130 (FIG. 1) is provided in the server 104 tostore portions of the association table 200 so that access to theassociation table 200 is minimized. FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustratinghow the cache 130 is utilized when a request for a StringID is processedaccording to an embodiment of the present invention. In step 502, theStringID generator 300 receives a request from a requesting mechanismfor a StringID and checks the cache 130 for the string in step 504. Ifthe string is located in the cache 130 (step 506), the StringIDgenerator 300 determines whether the string's status is temporary instep 507. If the string's status is not temporary, i.e., the stringstatus is permanent, the corresponding StringID is returned from thecache 130 to the requesting mechanism in step 512.

If the string's status is temporary (step 507), the StringID) generator300 determines whether the requesting mechanism is the storage mechanism110 (step 509). If the storage mechanism 110 is not the requestingmechanism, then the StringID from the cache 130 is returned to therequesting mechanism in step 512. Otherwise, i.e., the storage mechanism110 is the requesting mechanism, the string's status is changed topermanent in the cache 130 (step 510). In order to preserve coherencybetween the cache 130 and the association table 300, the StringIDgenerator 300 then locates the string in the association table 200 andchanges the string's status to permanent in step 511. Thereafter, theStringID from the cache 130 is returned to the storage mechanism in step512.

If the string is not in the cache 130 (step 506), the StringID generator300 performs a lookup on the association table 300 in step 508. Here,the StringID generator 300 processes the request as before described insteps 310 through 314 in FIG. 3, or as described in steps 410 through414 in FIG. 4. After the lookup, the StringID generator 300 returns theStringID to the requesting mechanism in step 512. In one embodiment, theStringID generator 300 also stores the string, its StringID, and thestatus in the cache 130.

In an embodiment, the cache 130 can store strings that are particularlyrelevant to the server 104. A database administrator can stock the cache130 with default entries from the association table 200, or with entriesfrom a copy of the cache 130 that was created previously. Accordingly,the cache 130 is “primed” when the DBMS 105 is initiated. By utilizingthe cache 130 according to the embodiment described above, access to theassociation table 200 is minimized. By minimizing such access, theconversion from strings to StringIDs is faster and less costly.

An improved method and system for processing structured documents storedin a database is disclosed. According to an embodiment, a globalassociation table 200 is provided to store strings and their respectiveStringIDs. In the embodiment, the strings correspond to element names,attribute names, and namespaces found in documents stored in thedatabase. Because a global association table 200 is utilized, a StringIDfor a particular string can be used in place of the string throughoutthe database. By replacing strings with their respective StringIDs,document processing and storage are significantly improved.

Although the present invention has been described in accordance with theembodiments shown, one of ordinary skill in the art will readilyrecognize that there could be variations to the embodiments and thosevariations would be within the spirit and scope of the presentinvention. Accordingly, many modifications may be made by one ofordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope ofthe appended claims.

1. A method for processing a structured document, the method comprising:identifying a plurality of strings processed by a database; assigning anidentifier to each of the plurality of strings; storing each of theplurality of strings and its assigned identifier in a table in thedatabase, wherein at least one of the plurality of strings is notderived from one or more structured documents stored in the database andat least another of the plurality of strings is derived from the one ormore structured documents stored in the database; and utilizing thetable during document processing.
 2. The method of claim 1, furthercomprising: designating a status for each of the plurality of strings,wherein the status is one of a temporary status or a permanent status;storing the status in the table; and providing a cache in the databasefor storing a portion of the table.
 3. The method of claim 2, whereinutilizing the table during document processing comprises: receiving arequest to store a structured document in the database, wherein thestructured document comprises a plurality of element, attribute, andnamespace strings; transforming the structured document by replacing theplurality of element, attribute, and namespace strings with theirrespective identifiers; and storing the transformed structured documentin the database.
 4. The method of claim 3, wherein transforming thestructured document comprises: requesting an identifier for one of theplurality of element, attribute, and namespace strings in the structureddocument; checking the cache for the one string; returning an identifierassigned to the one string when the one string is located in the cache;performing a lookup on the table for the one string when the one stringis not located in the cache; returning the identifier assigned to theone string when the one string is located in the table; and assigning anew identifier to the one string, storing the one string and the newidentifier in the table, designating a status of the one string aspermanent, and returning the new identifier when the one string is notlocated in the table.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein transforming thestructured document further comprises: checking a current status of theone string when it is located in the table; and changing the status ofthe one string to permanent when the current status is temporary.
 6. Themethod of claim 2, wherein utilizing the table during documentprocessing comprises: receiving a query, wherein the query comprises aplurality of element, attribute, and namespace strings; transforming thequery by replacing the plurality of element, attribute, and namespacestrings with their respective identifiers; and processing thetransformed query.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein transforming thequery comprises: requesting an identifier for one of the plurality ofelement, attribute, and namespace strings in the query; checking thecache for the one string; returning an identifier assigned to the onestring when the one string is located in the cache; performing a lookupon the table for the one string when the one string is not located inthe cache; returning the identifier assigned to the one string when theone string is located in the table; and assigning a new identifier tothe one string, storing the one string and the new identifier in thetable, designating a status of the one string as temporary, andreturning the new identifier when the one string is not located in thetable.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the identifier is a fixed-sizedinteger.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one string isderived from a query to the database.
 10. A computer readable mediumcontaining a computer program for processing a structured document, thecomputer program comprising instructions for: identifying a plurality ofstrings processed by a database; assigning an identifier to each of theplurality of strings; storing each of the plurality of strings and itsassigned identifier in a table in the database, wherein at least one ofthe plurality of strings is not derived from one or more structureddocuments stored in the database and at least another of the pluralityof strings is derived from the one or more structured documents storedin the database; and utilizing the table during document processing. 11.The computer readable medium of claim 10, wherein the computer programfurther comprises instructions for: designating a status for each of theplurality of strings, wherein the status is one of a temporary status ora permanent status; storing the status in the table; and providing acache in the database for storing a portion of the table.
 12. Thecomputer readable medium of claim 11, wherein utilizing the table duringdocument processing comprises: receiving a request to store a structureddocument in the database, wherein the structured document comprises aplurality of element, attribute, and namespace strings; transforming thestructured document by replacing the plurality of element, attribute,and namespace strings with their respective identifiers; and storing thetransformed structured document in the database.
 13. The computerreadable medium of claim 12, wherein transforming the structureddocument comprises: requesting an identifier for one of the plurality ofelement, attribute, and namespace strings in the structured document;checking the cache for the one string; returning an identifier assignedto the one string when the one string is located in the cache;performing a lookup on the table for the one string when the one stringis not located in the cache; returning the identifier assigned to theone string when the one string is located in the table; and assigning anew identifier to the one string, storing the one string and the newidentifier in the table, designating a status of the one string aspermanent, and returning the new identifier when the one string is notlocated in the table.
 14. The computer readable medium of claim 13,wherein transforming the structured document further comprises: checkinga current status of the one string when it is located in the table; andchanging the status of the one string to permanent when the currentstatus is temporary.
 15. The computer readable medium of claim 11,wherein utilizing the table during document processing comprises:receiving a query, wherein the query comprises a plurality of element,attribute, and namespace strings; transforming the query by replacingthe plurality of element, attribute, and namespace strings with theirrespective identifiers; and processing the transformed query.
 16. Thecomputer readable medium of claim 15, wherein transforming the querycomprises: requesting an identifier for one of the plurality of element,attribute, and namespace strings in the query; checking the cache forthe one string; returning an identifier assigned to the one string whenthe one string is located in the cache; performing a lookup on the tablefor the one string when the one string is not located in the cache;returning the identifier assigned to the one string when the one stringis located in the table; and assigning a new identifier to the onestring, storing the one string and the new identifier in the table,designating a status of the one string as temporary, and returning thenew identifier when the one string is not located in the table.
 17. Thecomputer readable medium of claim 10, wherein the identifier is afixed-sized integer.
 18. The computer readable medium of claim 10,wherein the at least one string is derived from a query to the database.19. A system for processing a structured document, the systemcomprising: a string identifier generator operable to identify aplurality of strings processed by the database and assign an identifierto each of the plurality of strings; a database in communication withthe string identifier generator, the database including a table operableto store each of the plurality of strings and its assigned identifier,wherein at least one of the plurality of strings is not derived from oneor more structured documents stored in the database and at least anotherof the plurality of strings is derived from the one or more structureddocuments stored in the database; and a cache in communication with thestring identifier generator and the database, the cache being operableto store a portion of the table, wherein the table and the cache areutilized during document processing.
 20. The system of claim 19, whereinthe string identifier generator is further operable to designate astatus for each of the plurality of strings, wherein the status is oneof a temporary status or a permanent status, and store the status in thetable.
 21. The system of claim 20, further comprising: a storagemechanism in communication with the string identifier generator, thedatabase, and the cache, the storage mechanism being operable to receiveand store a structured document in the database.
 22. The system of claim21, wherein the string identifier generator is further operable toreceive a request for an identifier for a string from the storagemechanism, check the cache for the string, return an identifier assignedto the string when the string is located in the cache, perform a lookupon the table for the string when the string is not located in the cache,return the identifier assigned to the string when the string is locatedin the table, and assign a new identifier to the string, store thestring and the new identifier in the table, designate a status of thestring as permanent, and return the new identifier when the string isnot located in the table.
 23. The system of claim 22, wherein the stringidentifier generator is further operable to check a current status ofthe string when it is located in the table and change the status of thestring to permanent when the current status is temporary.
 24. The systemof claim 20, further comprising: a compiler in communication with thestring identifier generator, the database, and the cache, the compilerbeing operable to receive and process a query to the database.
 25. Thesystem of claim 24, wherein the string identifier generator is furtheroperable to receive a request for an identifier for a string from thecompiler, check the cache for the string, return an identifier assignedto the string when the string is located in the cache, perform a lookupon the table for the string when the string is not located in the cache,return the identifier assigned to the string when the string is locatedin the table, and assign a new identifier to the string, store thestring and the new identifier in the table, designate a status of thestring as temporary, and return the new identifier when the string isnot located in the table.
 26. The system of claim 19, wherein theidentifier is a fixed-sized integer.
 27. The system of claim 19, whereinthe at least one string is derived from a query to the database.